Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 1

< April 30	May 2 >

May 1

File:Roza Gough.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too likely from a professional shoot to be uploader's creation. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 00:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Scrantic.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader claims that he is the copyright holder for this image and that he releases it into "public domain", but it's a software screenshot and I doubt User:Quesodood holds the copyright for this software. Korodzik (talk) 08:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Antalya side manavgat google today.jpg

Bogus license. See copyright notices in the image itself. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to File:Antalya side manavgat google.jpg, uploaded by the same user. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tyra_and_Heidi_2004.jpg

http://tineye.com/search/fe972c536be6dc92b74b348d7a6b880c1bbdfbf5 multichill (talk) 14:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capetownfm rc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; contains various logos and possibly copyrighted images, so I'm not sure if it is really "Selfmade!" as the description states. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ChristopherKlaus 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with CC-BY-SA, but image description contains incompatible license restrictions: "All other rights reserved. May not be sub-licensed, re-sold, or re-purposed without written permission from photographer Daemon Baizan." Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 14:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jeremy Farris.jpg

Two problems. First: has express limitation of "Image is used by people writing about or covering tech, but not for product endorsement or other advertising purposes," so not free. 2. Also contains an FUR, but this is a living person, so fail on NFCC#8 anyways. Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GCWTobey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted

Tagged {{PD-USGov}}. Source is given as http://www.state.nh.us/nhdhr/glikeness/tobechar.html, which no longer works but is not a United States federal government site; no evidence is provided that this image was created by the United States federal government. Charles W. Tobey died in 1953, so it is entirely possible that this image is still under copyright. —Bkell (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After some digging on the New Hampshire website, it seems as though this image was painted by Alice E. Cosgrove for a Federal Works Progress Administration project. So I'm pretty sure this would be in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a photograph, not a painting. I suppose it could be a black-and-white photograph of a painting, but that seems unlikely to me. —Bkell (talk) 18:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely a photo of a painting. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.